Enhancing digital payment risk management capacity in the digital society

line
29 tháng 03 năm 2026

ENHANCING DIGITAL PAYMENT RISK MANAGEMENT CAPACITY IN THE DIGITAL SOCIETY

Xu hướng dịch vụ tài chính số tại Việt Nam: Cơ hội và thách thức

ABSTRACT
This study analyzes digital payment risks in the context of the rapid growth of cashless payments in Vietnam, emphasizing the need to shift from a “fraud prevention” approach to a proactive
digital payment risk management framework. Based on illustrative data on transaction scale, the growth rate of QR payments, the level of bank account penetration, and financial losses caused by online fraud, the paper identifies several specific risk groups affecting citizens, students, and businesses. It also proposes a three-layer protection model (People – Process – Tools) and offers recommendations for universities, enterprises, financial institutions, and regulatory authorities.

1. Introduction

Cashless payment is shifting from a trend to a widely adopted transactional infrastructure in Vietnam’s digital economy. The rapid increase in the number of bank accounts, mobile transactions, and QR payments has created significant convenience for citizens, students, and businesses.

However, as transaction frequency rises, payment risks are not limited to online fraud. They also include operational errors, process-related risks, information risks, service disruption risks, and internal control risks. Therefore, it is necessary to shift the focus from merely “fraud warnings” to a more systematic approach to digital payment risk management.

2. Digital Payment Risks Beyond Online Fraud

·        Operational risks: transferring money to the wrong account, entering an incorrect amount, scanning the wrong QR code, or clicking the wrong payment link.

·        Process risks: lack of verification steps, inadequate authorization and access control, and absence of periodic reconciliation.

·        Information risks: exposure of personal data, leakage of device or account access credentials, and disclosure of transaction records.

·        Platform/partner risks: fake payment gateways, applications from unknown or unverified sources, and merchants that do not meet proper security standards.

·        Disruption and dispute risks: pending transactions, delayed recording of transactions, or money being deducted while the recipient has not yet confirmed receipt.

3. Practical Recommendations for Digital Payment Risk Management

3.1. For Universities

  • Incorporate safe digital payment skills into civic orientation weeks or soft skills courses.
  • Design simulation scenarios such as paying tuition fees, renting accommodation, online shopping, receiving scholarships, and part-time salary payments.
  • Collaborate with banks to organize regular seminars or workshops for students on digital payment risks.

3.2. For Businesses

  • Treat digital payment risk as part of financial management and internal control, not merely an IT issue.
  • Periodically review weaknesses in payment approvals, reconciliation processes, beneficiary account changes, and document verification.
  • Train frontline staff (accounting, procurement, sales administration) on payment verification procedures.

3.3. For Financial Institutions and Regulators

  • Develop digital financial education and communication programs tailored to specific groups (students, household businesses, the elderly, and SMEs).
  • Improve safety-by-design features in payment experiences (context-based alerts and additional verification layers).
  • Encourage the adoption of minimum digital payment control standards for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

4. Conclusion

Digital payments are a fundamental pillar of Vietnam’s digital economy, but their sustainability depends on the development of corresponding risk management capabilities. Data on transaction scale, the rapid growth of QR payments, and financial losses caused by online fraud indicate the need to shift from a reactive, post-incident response approach to a proactive prevention-oriented strategy.